You are viewing [info]eel_grass's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

July 9th and 10th


Just outside of Tromsø, Norway is a transmitting facility that is part of EISCAT, (European Incoherent Scatter), a multi-site research institute that studies the Sun’s effect on the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere. Any researchers can rent time at Tromsø provided they don’t mind their results being shared with all of the member nations and online.

EISCAT was briefly in the public eye in 2008 when the Svalbard unit partnered with Doritos to send a chip advertisement to another solar system. The Tromsø site, though, did little to attract public attention until December 9th, 2009, the night before Obama accepted his Nobel peace prize in Norway. For three minutes, people in the North of that country and in Northern Sweden saw this in the sky:

The next day, after initially denying it, the Russian Ministry of Defence claimed responsibility for the spiral and declared it the result of a failed missile test. Clearly, though, it was EISCAT. The spiral occurred very close to Tromsø and precisely when an experiment was scheduled, part of Project TEQUILAsunrise (Transient Effects Quantification Under Ionospheric Low Angle sunrise).

Most convincingly, though, in February 2008, a similar facility in Gakona, Alaska called HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) "managed to induce a strange bull's-eye pattern in the night sky [in which] surprising irregular luminescent bands radiated out from the centre of the bull's-eye." (Source: http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091002/full/news.2009.975.html?s=news_rss )

So, why did EISCAT, an organization that espouses transparency and makes so much of its data freely available online, allow the Russian Ministry of Defence to take responsibility for the Norway spiral?

According to the EISCAT website, TEQUILAsunrise was designed to “look at the polar wintertime mesophere through the transient caused by (scattered) sunrise around 8 UT.  Interestingly, this happens to be the maximum occurence time of the Polar Mesosphere Winter Echoes (PMWE)” (Source: http://www.eiscat.se/raw/schedule/comment.cgi?fileName=2009121016815&Start=0700&End=1000 --just select the date) Except for the fact that there would seem to be a word missing after transient, there is nothing alarming in that description and I would not have been alarmed had EISCAT simply said, “that crazy spiral you saw? That was just us messing with the Polar Mesosphere Winter Echoes”, but they didn’t. 

So, the mesosphere is filled with echoes and the blogosphere is filled with explanations. It is a weather manipulator that can turn a category two into a category five. It is a wormhole. It is a massive mind-control device (timed for the first time in a bazillion years that a US president was in Norway). It is a holographic projector to fake an alien invasion or the second coming of Christ. It could be any of these things. It could be all of these things. The only thing I’m pretty sure it’s not is a Russian missile.

I have a request. If this interests you at all, don’t forget about it in five minutes. Even if the Norway spiral is, as I’m inclined to believe, a well-intentioned if not entirely safe ionospheric heating experiment, we were still lied to and that’s not okay.

Video collection: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g75D5cxNlk4&NR=1

 
**ERRATA and AUTHOR'S UPDATE: July 29th, 2010**
1. There was, in fact, no word missing after "transient". "Transient" can be a noun meaning "a short lived oscillation in a system caused by a sudden change of voltage or current or load."
2. I know longer think the cause of the Norway Spiral was "clearly EISCAT". The official Russian missile explanation is possible if rather dull.
3. In late childhood I vowed I'd become an atmospheric researcher one day. The more I read about EISCAT the more determined I am do fulfill that dream. Yay sky!

Comments

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]eel_grass wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2010 06:08 pm (UTC)
On the other hand, I get such a good vibe from the EISCAT webpage I'm starting to believe that if they lied to us, they must have had good reason.
[info]nova_one wrote:
Jul. 11th, 2010 07:59 am (UTC)
I think I'm going to go with the missile. It looks like a missile spinning out of control (not that I've ever seen one, but here's a model of a staged rocket doing the same thing), and there's no clear motive for anyone to cover anything up - except the Russians initially, who may not want to go out of their way to promulgate their missile test failures.
[info]kutnitijna wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2010 05:10 pm (UTC)
I am not entirely clear on whether TEQUILAsunrise actually projected electricity into the atmosphere, or just used the antenna as a receiver to measure extant charges. The HAARP experiment consisted of supercharging the atmosphere at 3.6MW, whereas EISCAT can only channel 1.2MW. According to your Naturenews article, the most EISCAT could do, if they were running a similar experiment, is make weak sparkles in the air. Imagining for a moment that they did have more power, though, it seems unlikely that the spiral could result from the same experiment: The HAARP "bullseye", which was irregularly shaped, was the result of pockets of partially-ionised gas being ignited into plasma. The spiral is too regular in shape for that to seem plausible.
...UNLESS... [Drumroll, please]
A malfunctioning Russian rocket spun out of control, leaving an ion-trail which happened to be ignited by a covert EISCAT experiment running at a significantly higher voltage than officially acknowledged, causing the EISCAT authorities to cover up their involvement. Ironically, if I wanted to destroy a missile, aiming a superpowered beam of energy at it would seem to be like a good way to do that. Perhaps the top-secret EISCAT ray both destroyed the rocket and plasmified its exhaust trail. In fact, EISCAT may be an ABM system masquerading as a research facility for alcoholic scientists.
OR
It could be a real-world form of the transmission system from the (Ironically Russian) book and two-part movie which inspired 'Avatar', 'The Inhabited Island'.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 14th, 2010 01:17 am (UTC)
I thought the argument for a malfunctioning rocket was pretty convincing. But if it is caused by a ground-based ionospheric excitation then they'd have to have some pretty crazy power behind it to be that intense and visible. The HAARP's experiment was barely visible. This was bright and seen by a huge swath of people. The only artificial aurora I've heard of near that bright has been caused my nuclear testing in the upper atmosphere. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_altitude_nuclear_explosion). And I don't think the site in Norway can output that kind of power. At least I hope it can't. Also, I think this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4 gives a pretty good explanation.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Feb. 19th, 2011 09:37 am (UTC)
[BUY] Super Cheap SEO VPS - Earn more online
Hello there,

Are you into doing Seo work or simply just spamming blogs? Well i can provide you with a extremely cheap VPS with the following software set up (You use my license!)

SENuke pro edition (Normally costs $127 each month)
Scrapebox ($97)
The Best Spinner ($77 yearly)

Watch my quick YouTube video! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paExU60Hy8A

You can aquire access to all three of these super powerful SEO tools for a small charge of $50 per month.

The VPS server itself is super powerful and fast, you simply will not find this kind of offer anywhere else for this sort of price!

Visit http://hellomotow.net For more information
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

[info]eel_grass
eel_grass

Latest Month

May 2011
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    
Powered by LiveJournal.com